EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #08733
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "David R Newman" <drn@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- From: Wes Homard-Roy <Wes.Homard-Roy@northampton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 14:50:53 +0000
CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.
Hi David, Your mention of your modified autocompleter made me wonder if we had added any of own scripts which could be conflicting with the save. And of course, we had
😊 It was very useful to have your confirmation of how the script should be working though, so many thanks for that and sorry to have wasted your time! Kind regards, Wes From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk <eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
On Behalf Of Wes Homard-Roy via Eprints-tech CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the
University of Southampton. Hi David, Thanks for getting back to me. We are using the default autocompleter (so matching creators to other creators rather than to users?) as adapted by the ORCID plugin to include ORCIDs. As you say though, even when using the autocompleter, you should be able to edit the input and save that as new data, I assume? I can add a current creator to a record, using the autocompleter and
then add an ORCID (valid or not) in the ORCID field. If I move on through the workflow, I don’t get any warnings e.g. about an invalid ORCID, but when I return to the
Details stage in the workflow, the ORCID is no longer there. Thanks for any further advice you can give! Regards, Wes From:
eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk <eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
On Behalf Of David R Newman via Eprints-tech Hi Wes, I know that if you have the ORCID Support Advance plugin installed, it should grey out the creators ORCID field, so it can only be set if it is filled in from being associated with an existing creator in a live publication item. If you only have the ORCID
Support plugin installed, I think you should be able to manually add creators ORCIDs.
I have just tested this on what I believe to be the latest version of ORCID Support (without ORCID Support Advance being installed) and I was able to save an ORCID, even though I typed in an invalid number (0000-1111-2222-3333, has a checksum mismatch).
I also tested this by adding a creator through the autocompleter and then manually adding the ORCID and this worked fine as well. This is using a modified autocompleter that looks up user records rather than names/ORCIDs of creators who are already listed
against existing live publication items. However, the autocompleter you use should not effect what gets saved, if you make changes after you use the autocompleter, these should not be affected. If you can tell what autocomplete you are using, I may be better
able to help debug this problem. Otherwise, without being able to see someone trying to add creators (and ORCIDs) in real-time, it could be difficult to work out where the problem lies. Regards David Newmam On 10/09/2021 12:19, Wes Homard-Roy via Eprints-tech wrote:
Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not
the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. University of Northampton: Transforming Lives and Inspiring Change www.northampton.ac.uk This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from using, printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail or any information contained in it. We virus scan all E-mails leaving The University of Northampton but no warranty is given that this E-mail and any attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own virus checking. The right to monitor E-mail communications through our networks is reserved by us. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient,
you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. |
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- From: Wes Homard-Roy <Wes.Homard-Roy@northampton.ac.uk>
- Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- References:
- [EP-tech] ORCID Support Plugin
- From: Ranju Upadhyay <Ranju.Upadhyay@mu.ie>
- Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Plugin
- From: Will Fyson <will.fyson@cosector.com>
- Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- From: Ranju Upadhyay <Ranju.Upadhyay@mu.ie>
- Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- From: Wes Homard-Roy <Wes.Homard-Roy@northampton.ac.uk>
- Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- From: David R Newman <drn@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- From: Wes Homard-Roy <Wes.Homard-Roy@northampton.ac.uk>
- Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- From: Wes Homard-Roy <Wes.Homard-Roy@northampton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] ORCID Support Plugin
- Prev by Date: Re: [EP-tech] [EXTERNAL] Re: ORCID Support Plugin
- Next by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Error on New Metadata Field
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Sort view with creators_name and corp_creators
- Index(es):