EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #08354
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
Re: [EP-tech] New Issue : IRStats
- To: David R Newman via Eprints-tech <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: [EP-tech] New Issue : IRStats
- From: David R Newman <drn@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:34:19 +0100
I just noted that the diffs are reversed so the new version lines
are marked with a minus (-) and the old version with a plus (+)
rather than the other way round.
On 23/10/2020 14:50, David R Newman via
Eprints-tech wrote:
Hi Laurent,
I have attached the diffs need to fix the main /cgi/stats/report graphs and the individual graphs on the abstract/summary pages for each item. You will need to run "epadmin refresh_abstracts" once you have made the changes and reloaded your webserver so that each page is updated with the new _javascript_ code. I would recommend manually applying the changes rather than trying to use as a patch file, as I have really just copied and pasted the changes for a couple of different changesets and these are changes may have been made to a different version of these files than the ones you have installed on your repository.
Regards
David Newman
On 23/10/2020 14:25, Laurent Cloarec wrote:
CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.
Hi
All my apologizes for the previous post, proceeding from a too fast copy and paste.
I sent almost at same time a support request to "EPrints Services" (and Justin
experienced delays in receiving it, because of issues with mail servers) and a
post to this list, because I figured out that it was not only a problem with our
repository, but also with others repositories using "IRStats2"... And I was far
too much in hurry while posting to the list, so I didn't take time enough to
"clean" the content from its references to Southampton colleagues : sorry again
for all this.
And thank you for the "fix", but I confirm that the mail format is quite
"messy", both in the list archive and through the email client view...
Best regards
--
Laurent Cloarec
Service Commun de la Documentation - Service du Numérique Documentaire
Université Toulouse 1 Capitole
Le 23/10/2020 à 12:01, David R Newman a écrit :
Hi Laurent,
I don't know if Justin is being slow to respond so you felt driven to use the
tech list but this is not really appropriate for contacting EPrints Services.
There is a fix for the problem you report. I have actually posted this on the
tech list recently. I don't know if you have just joined the list or have been
on it a while. Here is the message on the mailing list archive:
https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="">
However, this seems to have broken the formatting of the diff I copied and
pasted. So it is probably best looking at this email in your email client if
you were on the mailing list back on 8th October.
Regards
David Newman
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
- References:
- [EP-tech] New Gold Support Issue : IRStats
- From: Laurent Cloarec <Laurent.Cloarec@ut-capitole.fr>
- Re: [EP-tech] New Issue : IRStats
- From: Laurent Cloarec <Laurent.Cloarec@ut-capitole.fr>
- Re: [EP-tech] New Issue : IRStats
- From: David R Newman <drn@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] New Gold Support Issue : IRStats
- Prev by Date: Re: [EP-tech] New Issue : IRStats
- Next by Date: Re: [EP-tech] New Issue : IRStats
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Sort view with creators_name and corp_creators
- Index(es):