EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.

Message: #07495


< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

[EP-tech] Does a proliferation of cache tables effect simple search performance?


Good morning All,

 

I was wondering whether anyone else incurred into this aspect of Eprints’ Simple Search, and whether this is the intended way it should work.

 

Every time a simple search is performed, Eprints creates a new cache table in the database – these tables are named with a ‘cache[0-9]+’ format.  

Eprints does not appear consider these cache tables as orphaned, and therefore these tables seem to remain in the database – it may happen that a large multitude of these tables are left in the database.

 

I would be curious to know more about these tables:

1 – Are these cache tables eventually supposed to be dropped by any process? ‘epadmin cleanup_cachemaps’ leaves these tables untouched, as it does not consider them as orphaned;

2 – Does a proliferation of cache tables impact the simple search performance? Having overabundance of cache tables to look through seems to me that can bring unwanted overhead to DB-related processes, but I might be missing something obvious;

 

Thank you – have a nice day!

Michele