EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #07495
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Does a proliferation of cache tables effect simple search performance?
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Does a proliferation of cache tables effect simple search performance?
- From: Michele Morelli <Michele.Morelli@cosector.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:07:00 +0000
Good morning All, I was wondering whether anyone else incurred into this aspect of Eprints’ Simple Search, and whether this is the intended way it should work. Every time a simple search is performed, Eprints creates a new cache table in the database – these tables are named with a ‘cache[0-9]+’ format. Eprints does not appear consider these cache tables as orphaned, and therefore these tables seem to remain in the database – it may happen that a large multitude of these tables are left in the database. I would be curious to know more about these tables: 1 – Are these cache tables eventually supposed to be dropped by any process? ‘epadmin cleanup_cachemaps’ leaves these tables untouched, as it does not consider them as orphaned; 2 – Does a proliferation of cache tables impact the simple search performance? Having overabundance of cache tables to look through seems to me that can bring unwanted overhead to DB-related processes, but I might be missing something obvious; Thank you – have a nice day! Michele |
- Follow-Ups:
- [EP-tech] Does a proliferation of cache tables effect simple search performance?
- From: Michele Morelli <Michele.Morelli@cosector.com>
- [EP-tech] Does a proliferation of cache tables effect simple search performance?
- References:
- [EP-tech] Does a proliferation of cache tables effect simple search performance?
- From: Michele Morelli <Michele.Morelli@cosector.com>
- [EP-tech] Does a proliferation of cache tables effect simple search performance?
- Prev by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Upload by URL floods /tmp
- Next by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Does a proliferation of cache tables effect simple search performance?
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] EPrints/CRIS
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] DOI handling in orcid_support_advance
- Index(es):