EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #02219
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:03:26 -0500
Stevan Harnad dijo [Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 01:19:47PM -0400]: > But, strategically, let the deposit be visible and OA immediately, while the "approval > process" is taking place. It is very frustrating and de-motivating to authors (whom > we are trying to encourage to deposit) not to have instant OA, but to have to wait > for an undeterminate buffer period. -- Mark my words, it makes a huge difference > in deposit rate (and to the compliance rate, if mandated). You are right, I'll try to push this with my group. But, yes, this will be only after we are able to implement this two-phase thing anyway.
- References:
- [EP-tech] Two-stage approval process?
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- [EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Two-stage approval process?
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Report Generator
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Report Generator
- Index(es):