EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #02217
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Two-stage approval process?
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Two-stage approval process?
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:42:47 -0500
Hi, I have been requested to add a stage in the approval process of my deposited records; user_roles _almost_ takes me there (http://wiki.eprints.org/w/User_roles.pl details how to add a user role with "eprint/buffer/move_archive:editor", and that _almost_ but not quite gets my request done), but there is a piece I cannot find how to specify. We need that: 1. A 'user' deposits a record 2. A 'editor' reviews it, mainly looking for needed metadata changes, and marks it as "ready for acceptance" 3. A 'legal_processor' acknowledges we have the needed copyright assignments/permissions, and moves it to the repository Steps 2 and 3 would ideally be done independent of each other, as they are separate review processes. But I'm willing to serialize So, ideally, where editors go to /cgi/users/home?screen=Review, I would like to have my 'legal_processor' go to, say, /cgi/users/home?screen=LegalOK, and just get those items that are not yet approved by them. Thanks for any comments,
- Follow-Ups:
- [EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] render abstracts, when document-fileds are changed
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Two-stage approval process?
- Index(es):