EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #02216
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- To: "'eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk'" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:16:38 +0100
Aaah, I see what you mean now. Look in ~/archives/ARCHIVEID/cfg/citations/ and also ~/archives/ARCHIVEID/cfg/cfg.d/eprint_render.pl These are the files that are used to control the rendering of an item - which again contain logic for different item types. The both eprints and documents have their own citations - normally the document citations are included in the EPrint citation. http://wiki.eprints.org/w/Citation_Format Cheers, John -----Original Message----- From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Joel Rosental R. Sent: 23 September 2013 16:04 To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Not showing some fields in views from created item type. Hi John, Thanks, but I guess that is when you want to actually deposit a new item type. What I mean is, once the items are deposited into the repository, if a person goes to "Browse by Year" -> Choose "Item Type" you will see items deposited under a certain year, grouped by item type. Well, there the default item types have more fields than the ones that I've created (custom ones). Regards. On 09/23/2013 11:27 AM, John Salter wrote: > You need to look at the 'workflow' configuration: > ~/archives/ARCHIVEID/cfg/workflows/eprint/default.xml > > This contains the informationabout which fields are shown for which item types, and also for which users. > > The documentation is here: http://wiki.eprints.org/w/Workflow_Format > The easiest thing to do for a new item type may be to search for a similar item in the workflow (e.g. if you've added something that similar to a journal article, look at how the workflow for that type works and copy some of it :o). > > Cheers, > John > > -----Original Message----- > From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Joel Rosental R. > Sent: 23 September 2013 09:31 > To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk > Subject: [EP-tech] Not showing some fields in views from created item type. > > Hi, > > I've created some custom item types within my EPrints repository, > although when I go to browse my eprints, I see that the new defined > item types only show a few fields like authors, year, publication title > and nothing else, but "default" item types (book, conference or workshop > items, etc) do show more information like the journal name, volume > issue, etc. > > In the new item type eprints, this fields are only visible if person > logs in, into EPrints. > > How could I do in order to show these fields with the new item types in > the views? > > Thanks > -- Joel Rosental R. System Administrator Tel: +34 91 481 69 87 Web: http://www.networks.imdea.org *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
- References:
- [EP-tech] Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- From: "Joel Rosental R." <joel.rosental@imdea.org>
- [EP-tech] Re: Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- From: "Joel Rosental R." <joel.rosental@imdea.org>
- [EP-tech] Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Two-stage approval process?
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Not showing some fields in views from created item type.
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Edit Subject : very slow but...
- Index(es):