EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #08305
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
Re: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- To: James Kerwin <jkerwin2101@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- From: David R Newman <drn@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:30:26 +0100
Hi James,
Hopefully, Symplectic RT2 will make things better. It uses
EPrints CRUD interface to submit data rather than having its own
handler that needs to run on EPrints and various cron jobs to
manage syncing.
I have certainly noted over time that EPrints 3.3.x seems to suffer from issues with excessive history records being created by third party applications but these have tended to be null edits for live items rather than these create then destroy records. That said, I have not been looking for these, so this may well also have been an issue but without any serious consequences.
Regards
David Newman
Hi David,
Thank you for this. I've managed to pin it down to the Symplectic Elements "get_records" script. The userid is NULL, but the actor is
"/opt/eprints3/bin/get_records"
Every record with this actor appears to have two revision = 1 entries and is created and immediately destroyed. I'm yet to find an EPrint ID amongst these that links to a real record. The "/usr/sbin/apache2" actor records are behaving as I'd expect.
I wonder why it's behaving in this way. Not to worry, we hopefully won't run out of numbers any time soon! It just means the history table is gigantic and it's already pretty weighty as it is. I'll look into it, but we're hopefully getting RT2 in this lifetime so maybe it won't be a problem then.
Thanks,James
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:10 PM David R Newman <drn@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi James,
If you are interacting with a third party application then this may explain the large number of "empty" eprint IDs. With just human user it is possible you will still get a few of these where a user goes to create a record and then never gets round to entering any metadata. They may then at some point go round and delete all their "empty" eprint records to tidy things up. However, the automated creation by a third party app seems more likely. You should get the userid and actor for these history records to see if you can see a pattern.
Regards
David Newman
On 24/08/2020 16:02, James Kerwin via Eprints-tech wrote:
Should I be concerned about the number of "empty" eprint IDs I see in the history table?
It appears there are a lot that have two instances of "revision = 1" where the record appears to be briefly created and then immediately destroyed and the relevant ID is skipped over and never used. I am making sure that I only look for "datasetid = eprint".
I don't want to get too bogged down with this because it's not the end of the world, but I am tempted to pull on the thread and see what's going on.
Thanks,James
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:41 PM James Kerwin via Eprints-tech <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
Ahhhh that's it! Thank you!
I'm now slightly embarrassed to say how long I spent searching through the various EPrints tables looking for this.
The initial plan is to have a script that looks at how many items are put in the repository and breaks them down by some time period (e.g. month). If it's still wanted I'll make it into a button on the admin side that provides either a spreadsheet/google docs link or maybe even use it as an opportunity to play with graph modules etc.
We did look into something similar last year where we get the upload date and proper deposit date (as defined by EPrints) to assess how long items spent in review. This felt a little bit too much like surveilling staff which isn't something I'm on board with so it was quickly dropped. "Do no evil..." and so on.
Thanks,James
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-techOn Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:08 PM John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi James,
The 'history' dataset is your friend here!
Are you wanting to do this for a handful of records, or script something?
A dataset search along these lines should work:
dataset: historydatasetid: eprint
dataobjid: the eprint id you are interested in
action: 'create'
The history dataset is searchable via the web interface, but for some older versions or EPrints you might want to add the 'datasetid' to the search form.
Let me know if you need more info!
Cheers,
John
From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of James Kerwin via Eprints-tech
Sent: 24 August 2020 13:43
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
Afternoon All,
In the EPrints database is there data on when a record was created? We have the date an item is deposited which indicates when an item was made live in the repository. The record is created prior to this when a user uploads a file or OA Link through Elements. The record is created in the review buffer.
When a record is modified there is a "last mod" date and when it goes into the live archive this is treated as the deposit date.
If not I can find a way to make it happen in future. It would be incredibly helpful if I didn't need to do this.
Thanks,
James
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
- References:
- [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- From: James Kerwin <jkerwin2101@gmail.com>
- Re: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- From: James Kerwin <jkerwin2101@gmail.com>
- Re: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- Re: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- From: James Kerwin <jkerwin2101@gmail.com>
- Re: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- From: James Kerwin <jkerwin2101@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- Prev by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- Next by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Date Record Created
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Sort view with creators_name and corp_creators
- Index(es):