EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #07389
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
- To: <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
- From: Will Fyson <R.W.Fyson@soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 12:03:12 +0100
Apologies, my previous email was a
little bit flippant on this issue! I agree we need to try and
store authenticated ORCIDs wherever possible. To that end we're
working on adding an annotation system so that where an ORCID is
imported from a trustworthy upstream system, this bit of
provenance is stored and we know not to try and check this ORCID
against a user account.
The alternative approach would be to introduce a notion of guest/external users to EPrints so that when external authors are added we can store the fact that this user was added via a trustworthy upstream system and we have an actual user object for them. Ultimately I believe ORCID themselves would prefer the idea that the repository emails the external author and so the author can authenticate their ORCID - this too would no doubt be easier to do with a guest/external user type, but should the ORCID plugin(s) be introducing new user types and muddying the user dataset? Many thanks, Will
From: John Salter [J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk] Sent: 02 August 2018 11:32 To: Eprints-tech Subject: Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update >
This naturally poses a problem for storing ORCIDs for external
authors, but in my experience most repositories are happy
storing ORCIDs for just their own users. This
concerns me. We (repository developers) shouldn't be
encouraging a blinkered approach to ORCIDs (or other
persistent identifiers). You
wouldn't exclude a DOI for a paper if it wasn't minted by your
institution - so why would you choose to discard ORCIDs for
non-local members? If
the ORCID has come from a trustworthy upstream system (e.g.
CrossRef, PubsRouter), then the ORCID should stay with the
author. Local
ORCIDs can supplement this data - so a record harvested from
your repository is 'improved'. I
was reading this:
https://support.crossref.org/hc/en-us/articles/214567746-Authors-and-editors
recently - and wondering what the 'authenticated="true"'
attribute actually meant - and how the this assertion should
be passed between systems. If
a *trusted* upstream system states that an ORCID is
authenticated - can we as a consumer of that data also state
that the ORCID is authenticated when relaying data from our
system? The
ORCIDs should be seen as an 'additive' set of data - if your
system can state that an author now has an ORCID - do it. Just
don't throw away data that already exists for non-local
authors. Cheers, John From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
[mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
On Behalf Of Will Fyson Hi Tomasz,
From: Tomasz Neugebauer [Tomasz.Neugebauer@concordia.ca]
Sent: 01 August 2018 17:50 To: Eprints-tech Subject:
Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
Hi
everyone who has installed the ORCID Support Advance plugin,
Will… I
am still looking to get a clearer picture of what I can expect
to happen when I install the ORCID Support Advance plugin on
top of the ORCID Support plugin that we currently have
working. What
will happen to the ORCID ID’s that we have already collected
in the author field of publications? The
description from Will below about ORCIDs from a DOI import
says this: “,
the ORCID field uses the creator/editor 'Email' column to lookup
user profiles in the repository that have connected to orcid.org
so that the creator/editor ORCID field can be verified. As such
any ORCID added via a DOI import, might then be erased if the
user profile lookup cannot be made. “ Does
the above also apply to any ORCIDs that we have been
collecting using the ORCID Support plugin? I
don’t think that our depositors have been diligently filling
in the email column in the author field during the deposit
process, does that mean that the user profile lookup will fail
and the ORCID will be deleted for any author that doesn’t have
an email listed in the author column?
When
does this deletion happen, during indexing? Is there any way
to prevent it from happening? Thanks
so much for any insight or advice on this is really
appreciated. Tomasz From:
eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
<eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
On Behalf Of Will Fyson Hi Everyone,
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/ *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/ |
- References:
- [EP-tech] Loading the manage deposits create a new cache table everytime
- From: Emilian Mitocariu <mitocariu.emilian@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
- From: Will Fyson <R.W.Fyson@soton.ac.uk>
- Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
- From: Tomasz Neugebauer <Tomasz.Neugebauer@concordia.ca>
- Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
- From: Will Fyson <R.W.Fyson@soton.ac.uk>
- Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Loading the manage deposits create a new cache table everytime
- Prev by Date: Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
- Next by Date: Re: [EP-tech] ORCID Support Advance Update
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] EPrints/CRIS
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] DOI handling in orcid_support_advance
- Index(es):