EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #04143
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Antwort: Re: upgrading IRStats to IRStats2
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Antwort: Re: upgrading IRStats to IRStats2
- From: martin.braendle@id.uzh.ch
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:07:52 +0200
Dear Matthew,
this is from our last nightly IRStats2 process_stats log, it might give you an estimate of how long a full statistics evaluation would run:
Access: it took 117 secs to parse 5665 records ( average = 48.42 records/sec )
Access: 3071 records kept out of 5665 ( ratio = 54.21% )
I can't comment on your initial question, though. No experience here with IRStats.
(Idea: I would try to compare the irstats2_* and irstats_* database tables on a small test repo to find out whether the old irstats tables could be converted).
Best regards,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Brändle
Zentrale Informatik
Universität Zürich
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zürich
mail: martin.braendle@id.uzh.ch
phone: +41 44 63 56705
fax: +41 44 63 54505
http://www.id.uzh.ch
Matthew Kerwin ---21/04/2015 02:02:02---I should also note that our 'access' table is multiple jiggle-bytes in size, with hundreds of millio
Von: Matthew Kerwin <matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au>
An: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Datum: 21/04/2015 02:02
Betreff: [EP-tech] Re: upgrading IRStats to IRStats2
Gesendet von: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
I should also note that our ‘access’ table is multiple jiggle-bytes in size, with hundreds of millions of records, so we’re not overly keen on running a full IRStats regen. We’re currently working on strategies to archive old records from the access table.
--
Matthew Kerwin | QUT Library eServices | matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au
From: Matthew Kerwin
Sent: Tuesday, 21 April 2015 09:50
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: upgrading IRStats to IRStats2
Hi folks, sorry if this has been covered elsewhere but I haven’t seen mention of it. One of our repositories was recently updated to 3.3, however we’re still running the old IRStats (v1). We’re eager to update to IRStats2, however we’re not sure what process to go through, nor what risks are involved.
Is there any advice on upgrading IRStats to IRStats2?
Cheers
--
Matthew Kerwin | Senior Web Developer | Applications & Development Team | Library eServices | Queensland University of Technology | Level 3, R Block, Kelvin Grove | matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au | CRICOS No 00213J
[Anhang "smime.p7s" gelöscht von Martin Brändle/at/UZH] *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
- References:
- [EP-tech] Re: upgrading IRStats to IRStats2
- From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au>
- [EP-tech] Re: upgrading IRStats to IRStats2
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: upgrading IRStats to IRStats2
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: [spam?] Problems with IRStats and IRStats2 after 3.3.13 upgrade
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: upgrading IRStats to IRStats2
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Use of truncation in advanced searches
- Index(es):