EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #04106
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- From: Bjoern Hassler <bjohas+mw@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 17:18:10 +0100
Hi Ian,
thanks for the answer.
What if one did this the other way round, i.e. institution-wide repository, and then do something on a departmental server to provide listings for that department?
Thanks!
Bjoern
On 3 April 2015 at 16:03, Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
I understand what you are trying to do.... and, in theory, it's a good idea.
If the departmental eprints were standard (unmodified) systems, then
each one can export records in the EPrint-XML format, and that will be
the same for all repositories.... and thus compatible with the main
Institution-level one.
Where things start to fall down is when repositories become modified....
and I don't mean in the templates and the way the web pages are
displayed - I mean in the contents stored for each record:
If one department classifies articles by research group, and another by
subject classification, then you can't merge them.
--
On 03/04/15 14:55, Bjoern Hassler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a newbie question, apologies if it's obvious.
>
> Is anybody in this situation: Several eprints instances within an
> institutiton (e.g. at departmental level), with an overall institutional
> level repository (populated entirely through OAI Harvester or otherwise)?
>
> Is this essentially supported out of the box by installing an
> institution-level eprints instance, and letting it harvest the
> departmental level instances?
>
> From a users perspective, is the functionality is the same (i.e.
> equally smooth, same look and feel, etc)? I.e. is there a difference
> between "native" records (say departmental level) and "harvested"
> records (institutional level), from the users perspective? By "user" I
> mean the person browsing the repository ("anonymously") on the web -
> obviously there's a difference from the contributors perspective.
>
> Does it make sense for the institutional repository to harvest
> departmental repositories? Or would it be preferable to have a single
> institutional repository and generate listings for departments from it
> (which should be viewable within the sub-domain owned by the
> department)? If the latter is preferable, what would be the simplest way
> of doing that? (Set up departmental repository, and let it harvest the
> institutional one? Or are there other e.g. API-based options?)
Ian Stuart.
Developer: ORI, RJ-Broker, and OpenDepot.org
Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team,
EDINA,
The University of Edinburgh.
http://edina.ac.uk/
This email was sent via the University of Edinburgh.
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
- References:
- [EP-tech] Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- From: Bjoern Hassler <bjohas+mw@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] RSS (2.0) items sort
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- Index(es):