EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #04104
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 16:03:25 +0100
I understand what you are trying to do.... and, in theory, it's a good idea.If the departmental eprints were standard (unmodified) systems, then each one can export records in the EPrint-XML format, and that will be the same for all repositories.... and thus compatible with the main Institution-level one.
Where things start to fall down is when repositories become modified.... and I don't mean in the templates and the way the web pages are displayed - I mean in the contents stored for each record:
If one department classifies articles by research group, and another by subject classification, then you can't merge them.
On 03/04/15 14:55, Bjoern Hassler wrote:
Hi all, I've got a newbie question, apologies if it's obvious. Is anybody in this situation: Several eprints instances within an institutiton (e.g. at departmental level), with an overall institutional level repository (populated entirely through OAI Harvester or otherwise)? Is this essentially supported out of the box by installing an institution-level eprints instance, and letting it harvest the departmental level instances? From a users perspective, is the functionality is the same (i.e. equally smooth, same look and feel, etc)? I.e. is there a difference between "native" records (say departmental level) and "harvested" records (institutional level), from the users perspective? By "user" I mean the person browsing the repository ("anonymously") on the web - obviously there's a difference from the contributors perspective. Does it make sense for the institutional repository to harvest departmental repositories? Or would it be preferable to have a single institutional repository and generate listings for departments from it (which should be viewable within the sub-domain owned by the department)? If the latter is preferable, what would be the simplest way of doing that? (Set up departmental repository, and let it harvest the institutional one? Or are there other e.g. API-based options?)
-- Ian Stuart. Developer: ORI, RJ-Broker, and OpenDepot.org Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team, EDINA, The University of Edinburgh. http://edina.ac.uk/ This email was sent via the University of Edinburgh. The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
- References:
- [EP-tech] Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- From: Bjoern Hassler <bjohas+mw@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] RSS (2.0) items sort
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Institutional level: several repositories vs. one
- Index(es):