EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #04051
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- To: Eprints Tech Mailing List <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: Denis Pitzalis <denis.pitzalis@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:03:45 +0100
Should we open an issue on github about this? Denis > On 09 Mar 2015, at 10:01, Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 09/03/15 08:48, Denis Pitzalis wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Maybe even easier would be to add a min_version and a max_version >> variables in the plugin definition. Like in PHP CMS. So we can define: >> $self->{min_version} = “>= 3.3.10”; >> $self->{max_version} = “< 3.3.12”; >> >> so we are sure that we always install the good version of a plugin. >> >> We could even go further and add a dependencies like: >> $self->{dependency} = “icon-builder>1.1.4”; >> >> etc >> >> What do you think? > > The downside to this approach is that plugins should remain compatible > with all releases of EPrints (and certainly within a Version: 3.1; 3.2; > 3.3;...) > The changes that kill plugins are changes to API calls... and those > shouldn't change within a version (so all function/api calls in 3.3.1 > should still work in 3.3.14 - though there may be additional > functionality available within those calls, or via new calls) > > I'd be happy with > > $self->{min_version} = “>= 3.2”; > $self->{max_version} = “< 3.4”; > > Anything else, and all Bazaar plugins automatically go "out of scope" on > every new release, until they are tested against an install of that new > release. > > -- > > Ian Stuart. > Developer: ORI, RJ-Broker, and OpenDepot.org > Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team, > EDINA, > The University of Edinburgh. > > http://edina.ac.uk/ > > This email was sent via the University of Edinburgh. > > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336. > > > *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech > *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ > *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ > *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
- References:
- [EP-tech] Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- From: pgasinos pgs <pgasinos@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Re: Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- From: pgasinos pgs <pgasinos@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: jens.vieler@id.uzh.ch
- [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: Denis Pitzalis <denis.pitzalis@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Antwort: Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Antwort: Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Index(es):