EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #04049
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- To: Eprints Tech Mailing List <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: Denis Pitzalis <denis.pitzalis@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:48:25 +0100
Hi all, Maybe even easier would be to add a min_version and a max_version variables in the plugin definition. Like in PHP CMS. So we can define: $self->{min_version} = “>= 3.3.10”; $self->{max_version} = “< 3.3.12”; so we are sure that we always install the good version of a plugin. We could even go further and add a dependencies like: $self->{dependency} = “icon-builder>1.1.4”; etc What do you think? Denis
|
- References:
- [EP-tech] Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- From: pgasinos pgs <pgasinos@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Re: Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- From: pgasinos pgs <pgasinos@gmail.com>
- [EP-tech] Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- From: jens.vieler@id.uzh.ch
- [EP-tech] Retired items lead to EPrints System Error
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: import_subjects Error Opening file 1
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Bazaar-Plugins vs. New EPrint Versions
- Index(es):