EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #03468
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- From: "Sheppard, Nick" <N.E.Sheppard@leedsmet.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:01:08 +0000
Hi Andrew - I think it was me pressed the button on the Lincoln repo, partly because I thought it would be easier to get the self-archived version for a co-authored paper for my repo (than ask the
academic!) and partly because we are migrating to eprints and I wanted to see how the request a copy button worked...might well bug you again when we come to implement!
Nick
Sent from my Windows Phone
Nick
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Andrew Beeken
Sent: 10/09/2014 14:45
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
I¹m not trying to be awkward here, just trying to understand this process
as my colleagues here are disagreeing! So, when we or the academic
receives a ³Request Copy² email there is a link in that email to say
³Approve this request² which then takes them to EPrints to confirm that
they approve the request. The requester then receives an email with a link
to download their document. If you¹re saying that this can¹t be done then
isn¹t the above a redundant feature?
On 10/09/2014 14:17, "Ian Stuart" <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>On 10/09/14 14:05, Andrew Beeken wrote:
>> But shouldn¹t the request a copy button create an unlocked version for
>>the
>> person that requested it?
>
>No, request a copy should email the person who deposited the record
>(assuming the depositor left a contact email address), so THEY can pass
>it on.
>
>Repositories cannot arbitrarily unlock restricted records - but
>depositors can send a copy to another researcher if they ask for it
>(under fair use guidelines)
>--
>
>Ian Stuart.
>Developer: ORI, RJ-Broker, and OpenDepot.org
>Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team,
>EDINA,
>The University of Edinburgh.
>
>http://edina.ac.uk/
>
>This email was sent via the University of Edinburgh.
The University of Lincoln, located in the heart of the city of Lincoln, has established an international reputation based on high student satisfaction, excellent graduate employment and world-class research.
The information in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately and remove it from your system. Do not disclose the contents to another person or take copies.
Email is not secure and may contain viruses. The University of Lincoln makes every effort to ensure email is sent without viruses, but cannot guarantee this and recommends recipients take appropriate precautions.
The University may monitor email traffic data and content in accordance with its policies and English law. Further information can be found at: http://www.lincoln.ac.uk/legal.
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
as my colleagues here are disagreeing! So, when we or the academic
receives a ³Request Copy² email there is a link in that email to say
³Approve this request² which then takes them to EPrints to confirm that
they approve the request. The requester then receives an email with a link
to download their document. If you¹re saying that this can¹t be done then
isn¹t the above a redundant feature?
On 10/09/2014 14:17, "Ian Stuart" <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>On 10/09/14 14:05, Andrew Beeken wrote:
>> But shouldn¹t the request a copy button create an unlocked version for
>>the
>> person that requested it?
>
>No, request a copy should email the person who deposited the record
>(assuming the depositor left a contact email address), so THEY can pass
>it on.
>
>Repositories cannot arbitrarily unlock restricted records - but
>depositors can send a copy to another researcher if they ask for it
>(under fair use guidelines)
>--
>
>Ian Stuart.
>Developer: ORI, RJ-Broker, and OpenDepot.org
>Bibliographics and Multimedia Service Delivery team,
>EDINA,
>The University of Edinburgh.
>
>http://edina.ac.uk/
>
>This email was sent via the University of Edinburgh.
The University of Lincoln, located in the heart of the city of Lincoln, has established an international reputation based on high student satisfaction, excellent graduate employment and world-class research.
The information in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately and remove it from your system. Do not disclose the contents to another person or take copies.
Email is not secure and may contain viruses. The University of Lincoln makes every effort to ensure email is sent without viruses, but cannot guarantee this and recommends recipients take appropriate precautions.
The University may monitor email traffic data and content in accordance with its policies and English law. Further information can be found at: http://www.lincoln.ac.uk/legal.
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/
From 22 September 2014 Leeds Metropolitan University will become Leeds Beckett University.
Find out more at http://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to:-
http://www.leedsmet.ac.uk/email-disclaimer.htm
- References:
- [EP-tech] Login required to retrieve requested documents
- From: Andrew Beeken <anbeeken@lincoln.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- From: Andrew Beeken <anbeeken@lincoln.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- From: Andrew Beeken <anbeeken@lincoln.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- From: Andrew Beeken <anbeeken@lincoln.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Login required to retrieve requested documents
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Login required to retrieve requested documents
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Publication status field in conferences and workshops
- Index(es):