EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #03277
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: IRstats vs IRstats2
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: IRstats vs IRstats2
- From: raffaele messuti <raffaele.messuti@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:18:01 +0200
Paolo Tealdi wrote: > After a quite simple installation and a not so long reindexing time (seems to be quicker than IRStat), i found that IRstats2 "counts" downloads > in a different way than IRstats. Specifically download numbers seem to be higher in IRStats2 than IRstats. > Is it possible? Are they starting from different ideas from what they think to be a "single download" ? > In this case, when i will put it in production, i've to declare that the old and new software have different counting approach ... ciao Paolo, i think is something about the double clicks counting. in irstats1 what setting do you have for repeats_filter_timeout? the default is 1 day: #repeat timeout in seconds (the amount of time there needs to be between two hits for second hit to be recorded). #initially set to 60*60*24 = 1 day repeats_filter_timeout = 86400 in eprints2 the default setting is 1 hour: https://github.com/eprints/irstats2/blob/master/cfg/cfg.d/z_irstats2.pl#L124 a few months ago i asked about compliance with projectcounter (that suggest 10sec): http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/18665.html bye -- raffaele
- References:
- [EP-tech] IRstats vs IRstats2
- From: Paolo Tealdi <paolo.tealdi@polito.it>
- [EP-tech] IRstats vs IRstats2
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Importing several items from an XML file
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Browse view by document language.
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] IRstats vs IRstats2
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Browse view by document language.
- Index(es):