EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #03274
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] IRstats vs IRstats2
- To: "<eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] IRstats vs IRstats2
- From: Paolo Tealdi <paolo.tealdi@polito.it>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:38:17 +0200
Dear all and Seb, as you already know from my last mail, i'm evaluating IRstats2 plugin. After a quite simple installation and a not so long reindexing time (seems to be quicker than IRStat), i found that IRstats2 "counts" downloads in a different way than IRstats. Specifically download numbers seem to be higher in IRStats2 than IRstats. Is it possible? Are they starting from different ideas from what they think to be a "single download" ? In this case, when i will put it in production, i've to declare that the old and new software have different counting approach ... Best regards, Paolo Tealdi P.S. Anyway the new plugin seems to me wonderful for the web pages it creates and for the very simple (and powerful) configuration: great work Seb!! -- Ing. Paolo Tealdi Area IT - Politecnico Torino Telefono/Phone : +39-011-0906714 , FAX : +39-011-0906799 Indirizzo/Address : C.so Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 - 10129 Torino - ITALY Skype : tealdi.paolo Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Search in subjects and divisions does nothing
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Advanced Search
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Advanced Search
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: IRstats vs IRstats2
- Index(es):