It was more inconsistencies in our author names - things like “Jones, M” and “Jones, M.”…

Bring on the ORCID’s! :o)

No worries.

process_stats --uninstall should remove all the irstats2 tables :)

Seb.

On 29.11.2013 14:14, John Salter wrote:

Thanks for the tip - I crowbarred it onto our dev server - but will try your method on the live one - and let you know.

And thanks Seb - this resolved the issue.

It doesn't clean our data up - which is the next hurdle :o)

Cheers,

John

-----Original Message-----

From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Peter West

Sent: 29 November 2013 13:48

To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.ukSubject: [EP-tech] Re: IRstats2 - creatos_name (no id) results in HASH(0x...) in set and non-grouping of resources

Hi

checksum errors on the bazaar can be resolved by going to the developer 

tools tab (on the admin bazaar page). Then select "edit" and then "save 

and return" - this should generate a new checksum for you (you don't 

need to actually edit anything).

N.B. I have used this trick to allow me to disable & uninstall stuff but 

I have not tried it for an upgrade so please let me know if it works for 

that too.

Thanks

Peter

On 29/11/13 13:26, John Salter wrote:

I was hoping that would be the answer :o) How do I resolve this (when updating the epm): Checksum mismatch encountered for lang/en/phrases/irstats2.xml Cheers, John *From:*eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *sf2 *Sent:* 29 November 2013 11:56 *To:* eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk *Subject:* [EP-tech] Re: IRstats2 - creatos_name (no id) results in HASH(0x...) in set and non-grouping of resources John, Try with the latest (0.0.5)? Seb On 29.11.2013 11:32, John Salter wrote: Hi, We've currently got IRStats 0.0.3 (beta) on our server. We don’t have ids for authors, so have a set configured: # just using creators_name { 'name' => 'creators', 'field' => 'creators', 'use_ids' => 0, }, This results in same-authors not getting grouped - the reason looks like the 'name' hash isn't turned into something that can be compared. In the database, the following is stored: mysql> select * from irstats2_sets_creators LIMIT 10; +-----------------+--------------+ | set_value | set_eprintid | +-----------------+--------------+ | HASH(0x3e22700) | 5 | | HASH(0x3f77510) | 1864 | | HASH(0x3f77510) | 8946 | | HASH(0x3f77540) | 7304 | | HASH(0x3f775b8) | 407 | | HASH(0x3f775d0) | 4023 | | HASH(0x3f775d0) | 7339 | | HASH(0x3f77630) | 393 | | HASH(0x3f776c0) | 6006 | | HASH(0x3f776d8) | 5064 | +-----------------+--------------+ Has anyone else come across this? If so, is a more recent version (0.0.5) better? If not, I'll see if I can fix it! Cheers, John *** Options:http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive:http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki:http://wiki.eprints.org/ *** EPrints developers Forum:http://forum.eprints.org/ *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ *** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/

-- 

Peter J. West

EPrints Services

School of Electronics and Computer Science

University of Southampton, UK

pjw@ecs.soton.ac.uk

*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech

*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/

*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/

*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/

*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech

*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/

*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/

*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/