EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #00823
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: Does document tags still need extra namespace declaration and why?
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Does document tags still need extra namespace declaration and why?
- From: Florian Heß <hess@ub.uni-heidelberg.de>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:32:49 +0200
Am 28.06.2012 13:02, schrieb Florian Heß:
Hi, according to the wiki page at http://wiki.eprints.org/w/XML_Export_Format I need to put an extra namespace declaration into to each document tag, although it is identical to the one in the eprint tag surrounding the metadata of a record. Isn't that redundant when using modern xml parser libraries like XML::LibXML which usually respects inheritance rules of the xmlns attribute?
To reply to myself (in case someone is interested): Looks like namespace declaration is omittable in the document tag, import works without it after all.
:-) Florian
Kind regards, F Heß
-- UB Heidelberg (Altstadt) Plöck 107-109, 69117 HD - Informationstechnik - WWW-Redaktion Tel. 06221 / 54 3550 http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/
- References:
- [EP-tech] Does document tags still need extra namespace declaration and why?
- From: Florian Heß <hess@ub.uni-heidelberg.de>
- [EP-tech] Does document tags still need extra namespace declaration and why?
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Upgrading from 3.0.5
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Does document tags still need extra namespace declaration and why?
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Does document tags still need extra namespace declaration and why?
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: Does document tags still need extra namespace declaration and why?
- Index(es):