EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.

Message: #09456

< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

Re: [EP-tech] DataCiteDOI plugin

CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.
Hi George,
Thanks for the thoughts.

Yes - this comes about from the White Rose three-way fun, but there is a similar situation we may encounter when housing two pre-existing collections together into one (Leeds specific) repository.

In that case, a different prefix is used for each collection, but (I think) one DataCite account has the ability to mint under both prefixes.

You can try adding a DOI with a different prefix to the relevant field of a dataobject, but it doesn't work. Currently the code checks whether the DOI supplied starts with the expected prefix e.g. https://github.com/eprintsug/DataCiteDoi/blob/main/lib/plugins/EPrints/Plugin/Event/DataCiteEvent.pm#L66 

I'll make a public branch and put the code in there. It can be merged into the main branch if others would find it useful. If not, I'll just reference the branch from my stack 🙂

Cheers,
John

From: eprints-tech-request@ecs.soton.ac.uk <eprints-tech-request@ecs.soton.ac.uk> on behalf of George Macgregor <George.Macgregor@glasgow.ac.uk>
Sent: 20 October 2023 11:46
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: [EP-tech] DataCiteDOI plugin
 
CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.
CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.

Hi John – Gosh, that sounds quite unusual – but interesting! Is this arising from the White Rose Repo consolidation of mint-able works across three difference institutions, each with their own DataCite membership? I would suggest that it is local requirement. But how unique is the White Rose scenario? Perhaps I am underestimating the number of shared EPrints repos out there…?

 

However, I can envisage use cases, for example if a standalone repo is used for an overlay journal, that there might be requirements to transfer a previous DOI account(s) to the local repo, thereby requiring the local repo to operate several accounts. There are probably other use cases that I haven’t thought about. So, perhaps less unusual and more uncommon.

 

Cheers

 

George

 

 

--

George Macgregor

Information Services | University of Glasgow

Web: https://purl.org/g3om4c  | Fediverse: @g3om4c@code4lib.social
orcid.org/0000-0002-8482-3973

Mobile: +44 (0)7977 858281
--

The University of Glasgow is a registered Scottish charity: Registration Number SC004401

 

 

 

From: eprints-tech-request@ecs.soton.ac.uk <eprints-tech-request@ecs.soton.ac.uk> On Behalf Of John Salter
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2023 11:10 AM
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [EP-tech] DataCiteDOI plugin

 

CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.

CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton.

Hi EPrints people,

 

The current implementation of the DataCite DOI plugin (https://github.com/eprintsug/DataCiteDoi) expects one prefix and one user account to mint DOIs with.

 

I need to mint things against multiple prefixes, and with multiple accounts.

Do other people have a similar requirement at all - or is it just a local requirement I have?

 

Cheers,

John

 

 

John Salter

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8611-8266

 

White Rose Libraries Technical Officer
IT - Application Support (Research)
University of Leeds