EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #06489
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
Re: [EP-tech] Does 'can_clone' work correctly?
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: [EP-tech] Does 'can_clone' work correctly?
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:11 +0000
Hi Matt, I've just created test fields on a 3.3.10 repository, and when using the 'New version' button, the fields DO NOT get cloned. Things seem to work as expected/intended, using the field definitions you used. Do you have any automatic fields that might be setting this data (so although it looks 'cloned' it's getting set independently)? Do you have any triggers that might be doing anything? Could you (not quite sure how) have the same field definition more than once (with the later version having a different 'can_clone' setting)? Have you got something that's overriding the 'clone' method? Possibly adding debug statements to EPrints::DataObj::EPrint::clone might be the quickest way forward… Cheers, John From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
On Behalf Of Matthew Brady Hi All, BUMP… Anyone have any ideas how to set a field parameter as ‘can_clone=>0’ for field definitions within the eprints_fields.pl file? We have some fields that are visible to editorial staff only, which flag various details about the items in the repository. The problem is, when an item is cloned, these extra ‘unknown to the end user’ fields are also cloned and set, with what appear to be valid notes/data… I thought the ‘can_clone’ property would stop these data fields from being copied across, but alas, nothing I have tried has appeared to work. I would rather not have to disable the clone button, but if that’s the only option then that’s how I have to do it… Cheers Matt. From:
eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
On Behalf Of Matthew Brady Hi, Just wondering if anyone else can verify a problem I am having, (or doing wrong) on a 3.3.10 instance… According to the documentation (https://wiki.eprints.org/w/Metadata), can_clone is a property that can be set
in the field definitions, and is used quite liberally in the EPrints.pm : get_system_field_info sub e.g. {
name=>"datestamp",
type=>"time",
required=>0,
import=>0,
render_res=>"minute",
render_style=>"short",
can_clone=>0
}, {
name=>"lastmod",
type=>"timestamp",
required=>0,
import=>0,
render_res=>"minute",
render_style=>"short",
can_clone=>0,
volatile=>1
}, {
name=>"status_changed",
type=>"time",
required=>0,
import=>0,
render_res=>"minute",
render_style=>"short",
can_clone=>0
}, to filter out data you don’t want to copy across when cloning… foreach my
$field
(
$self->{dataset}->get_fields
) {
next if(
$field->get_property(
"can_clone"
) );
delete
$data->{$field->get_name}; } Taking this a step further, I have altered the local repository eprint_fields.pl field definitions, to include the can_clone => 0 into a few test fields, but the
data still gets cloned into the new record. e.g. {name
=>
'test_field_1',
type
=>
'set',
options
=> ['yes','no','pending'],
can_clone
=>
0,
}, Can anyone confirm if it’s not working correctly, or point me to what I’m doing wrong ?
Cheers Matt
_____________________________________________________________
This email (including any attached files) is confidential and is for the intended recipient(s) only. If you received this email by mistake, please, as a courtesy, tell the sender, then delete this email.
The views and opinions are the originator's and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Southern Queensland. Although all reasonable precautions were taken to ensure that this email contained no viruses at the time it was sent we accept no liability for any losses arising from its receipt.
The University of Southern Queensland is a registered provider of education with the Australian Government.
(CRICOS Institution Code QLD 00244B / NSW 02225M, TEQSA PRV12081 )
|
- References:
- [EP-tech] Does 'can_clone' work correctly?
- From: Matthew Brady <Matthew.Brady@usq.edu.au>
- [EP-tech] Does 'can_clone' work correctly?
- From: Matthew Brady <Matthew.Brady@usq.edu.au>
- [EP-tech] Does 'can_clone' work correctly?
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Does 'can_clone' work correctly?
- Next by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Finding missing components
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Does 'can_clone' work correctly?
- Next by thread: Re: [EP-tech] Does 'can_clone' work correctly?
- Index(es):