EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #06134
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Query re '/opt/eprints3/bin/lift_embargos script and embargo length
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "Annette Moore" <a.moore@sussex.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Query re '/opt/eprints3/bin/lift_embargos script and embargo length
- From: Annette Moore <a.moore@sussex.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:29:03 +0000
Hi
We have had an example recently on our EPrints repository where an embargo on a restricted access PDF has been lifted by the 'lift_embargos' script when there wasn't an embargo date but the embargo length of 18 months had been added manually. From the history it looks like the published date had been added the day before but the embargo date not added (human error). Is there any connection between the lift_embargos script ad the embargo length with the REF CC v.1.1.1. Plugin ? We are unsure why the full text restriction as lifted in this instance and concerned that there may be other instances.
Could anyone with more technical knowledge of the lift_ embargo script and the automatic calculation of the embargo length field in the REF CC tab shed any light on the above or offer a possible explanation?
Regards
Annette
Acquisitions and metadata Librarian
University of Sussex
Sent from my Windows Phone
We have had an example recently on our EPrints repository where an embargo on a restricted access PDF has been lifted by the 'lift_embargos' script when there wasn't an embargo date but the embargo length of 18 months had been added manually. From the history it looks like the published date had been added the day before but the embargo date not added (human error). Is there any connection between the lift_embargos script ad the embargo length with the REF CC v.1.1.1. Plugin ? We are unsure why the full text restriction as lifted in this instance and concerned that there may be other instances.
Could anyone with more technical knowledge of the lift_ embargo script and the automatic calculation of the embargo length field in the REF CC tab shed any light on the above or offer a possible explanation?
Regards
Annette
Acquisitions and metadata Librarian
University of Sussex
Sent from my Windows Phone
- Prev by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Antwort: IRStats2: Innodb tables; forks
- Next by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Adding Licences and Types
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Adding Licences and Types
- Next by thread: Re: [EP-tech] Query re '/opt/eprints3/bin/lift_embargos script and embargo length
- Index(es):