EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #05900
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
Re: [EP-tech] Altmetrics and Connotea
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: [EP-tech] Altmetrics and Connotea
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 22:00:03 +0000
I did a diff on the two versions [1,2] – and aside from differences caused by them being different EPrints in the Bazaar, they’re the same. The base64 representation of the files are
identical. I think 540 is ‘noise’ and should be removed? I’ve made this commit: https://github.com/eprintsug/altmetric/commit/f60864720bbacbc7daf05b5dc45d088accc54087 which should resolve it, and also hint at other ‘cited by’ options. Does anyone have any opinions on the current default options? [
'tweeters',
'rdts',
'feeds',
'gplus',
'msm',
'fbwalls',
'videos' ] Current possible values are: posts (combined total of below?) delicious, fbwalls, feeds, forum, gplus, linkedin, msm, peer_review_sites, pinners, policies, qs, rdts, rh, tweeters, videos, weibo, wikipedia Is it worth including instructions in the js file about the best way to override it (copying it from ~/lib/static/_javascript_/auto/99_altmetric.js to ~/archives/ARCHIVEID/cfg/static/_javascript_/auto/99_altmetrics.js
and editing the copy)? I realise this will be included in the JS file sent over the wire – so may be seen as wasted bytes? Are there any other improvements that are needed for the Altmetrics plugin before a new release is made? Looks like it supports ISBNs now as well as DOIs… Cheers, John [1]
http://bazaar.eprints.org/cgi/export/eprint/340/EPM/bazaar-eprint-340.xml [2]
http://bazaar.eprints.org/cgi/export/eprint/450/EPM/bazaar-eprint-450.xml From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
On Behalf Of John Salter Hmm, anyone know where this version has come from: http://bazaar.eprints.org/450/ The package is called ‘altmetrics-dev’ – which I think is why it doesn’t appear as a later version of the other altmetrics packages. Both 340 and 450 are labelled as v1.0.5 I’m not sure what the differences in this new one are? Once this new version is understood, I have a look at the PR and other changes to make a v1.0.6. Cheers, John From:
eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
On Behalf Of Tomasz Neugebauer I recently installed the Altmetrics bazaar plugin (http://bazaar.eprints.org/340/)
It works well, but it displayed “0 readers on Connotea” on every badge, as it does on most repositories. Connotea has been discontinued in 2013, and Altmetrics does not track this data anymore, so the references to Connotea should be removed in the plugin. I propose how to fix it here:
https://github.com/eprintsug/altmetric/issues/1 Tomasz ________________________________________________
Tomasz Neugebauer |
- References:
- [EP-tech] Altmetrics and Connotea
- From: Tomasz Neugebauer <Tomasz.Neugebauer@concordia.ca>
- Re: [EP-tech] Altmetrics and Connotea
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Altmetrics and Connotea
- Prev by Date: Re: [EP-tech] Altmetrics and Connotea
- Next by Date: Re: [EP-tech] request copy error message
- Previous by thread: Re: [EP-tech] Altmetrics and Connotea
- Next by thread: Re: [EP-tech] Altmetrics and Connotea
- Index(es):