EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.

Message: #04468


< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

[EP-tech] Re: Edit 'Latest Additions' page


Hi,

Thanks for the help everyone.  Is it possible to have it show the full date of the submission as the section title, rather than just the day?  We're going back 6 months so a proper date is needed.

Thanks,
Mike.


-----eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: -----
To: "'eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk'" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
From: John Salter
Sent by: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Date: 07/07/2015 05:08AM
Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Edit 'Latest Additions' page

Hi Mike,

The code that is called is ~/cgi/latest

 

Instead of editing the copy there, make a copy:

~/archives/ARCHIVEID/cgi/latest

 

Look for the line:

my $date = time() - 86400 * 7; # 7 days

you can change that to suit.

You’ll also need to change the line that starts:

for( my $d=0; $d<7; ++$d )

- which steps through the number of days and creates a section for each one.

 

There is also the ~/cgi/latest_tool script.

This reads the ‘latest_tool_modes’ from the archive config, which my default is in ~/archives/ARCHIVEID/cfg/cfg.d/latest_tool.pl

You can do some useful things with this – as it allows you to specify a specific citation style to use, and to create a named mode that can be a filtered subset of items – e.g. you could create a subject- or division-specific ‘latest’ list – and create a citation style that embeds Altmetrics in it.

 

Cheers,

John

 

 

 

 

From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Michael Street
Sent: 06 July 2015 21:55
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [EP-tech] Edit 'Latest Additions' page

 

Hi,

 

Can someone point me to where I can edit the 'Latest Additions' to configure it go back further in time?


Thanks,

Mike