EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #04266
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: 2 IRStats Questions
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: 2 IRStats Questions
- From: "Alan.Stiles" <alan.stiles@open.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:52:37 +0000
Hi Greg, There is the possibility that your top authors have multiple items which have each only been downloaded a lower number of times, but the total of which may be greater than the number of downloads each of your
top items has received. Hope that makes sense? Alan From: Greg Whitney [mailto:greg.whitney@polymtl.ca]
Hello, We installed IRStats on our EPrints 3.3.13 test server. The 5 Most Downloaded Items DO NOT correspond with the 5 Top Authors. See attached gif. The TOP 5 counts also vary greatly for both tables. It is Friday, so maybe I am missing something obvious, but shouldn’t the most downloaded items and top authors be identical. Unless there is another definition for Top Authors?? Thanks! Have a good week-end! Greg Whitney Polytechnique Montréal Library PS – Also, 16 834 downloads for our top PhD thesis seems to be a lot!! Given the rather precise subject of this document. Is there anyway of validating these crunched numbers?? |
- References:
- [EP-tech] 2 IRStats Questions
- From: Greg Whitney <greg.whitney@polymtl.ca>
- [EP-tech] 2 IRStats Questions
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] 2 IRStats Questions
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Multilingual site
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] 2 IRStats Questions
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: 2 IRStats Questions
- Index(es):