EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #04232
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: eprintid reassignment
- To: "'eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk'" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: eprintid reassignment
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:31:14 +0000
Hi Simon, I’d suggest to the powers-that-be, that what they *really* want is to mint sequential DOIs for their datasets, rather than trying to crowbar that requirement
onto the EPrintID..? Cheers, From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk
[mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Simon Jennings Hi Adam, It seems that the they really just don't like the idea of non-sequential eprint ids.
I've explained the implications of reclaiming the ID so I'm guessing its something we won't pursue. Thanks for all of the advice. Simon. |
- References:
- [EP-tech] Re: eprintid reassignment
- From: "Simon Jennings" <Simon.Jennings@lshtm.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: eprintid reassignment
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: exact match on advanced search
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Upgrading 3.2.5 to 3.3.13
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: eprintid reassignment
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] exact match on advanced search
- Index(es):