EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

Message: #04149

< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

[EP-tech] Re: Antwort: Use of truncation in advanced searches

Hi,

Thanks to both of you.

I have found the reason of the slowness with truncation.
It comes from the "COLLATE utf8_general_ci" used with LIKE.

If I run the query used by EPrints, it runs for 5 minutes :

   mysql> SELECT eprint.eprintid FROM eprint LEFT JOIN
   eprint__ordervalues_fr ON eprint.eprintid =
   eprint__ordervalues_fr.eprintid ,
        -> eprint__rindex AS eprint__rindex WHERE eprint.eprintid =
   eprint__rindex.eprintid AND(
        ->     eprint.metadata_visibility = 'show' AND
   eprint.eprint_status = 'archive' AND(
        ->         eprint__rindex.field = 'title' AND
   eprint__rindex.word COLLATE utf8_general_ci LIKE 'thermograph%' OR
   eprint__rindex.field = 'titre_parallele_titre' AND
   eprint__rindex.word COLLATE utf8_general_ci LIKE 'thermograph%' OR
   eprint__rindex.field = 'autre_titre_titre' AND eprint__rindex.word
   COLLATE utf8_general_ci LIKE 'thermograph%'
        ->     )
        -> ) GROUP BY eprint.eprintid ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.date ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.creators_name ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.title ORDER BY
   eprint__ordervalues_fr.date DESC ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.creators_name ASC ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.title ASC;
   +----------+
   | eprintid |
   +----------+
   |   513588 |
   |   477759 |
   |   476746 |
   |   426892 |
   +----------+
   4 rows in set (5 min 33.61 sec)

But without the COLLATE part, it returns immediatly...

   mysql> SELECT eprint.eprintid FROM eprint LEFT JOIN
   eprint__ordervalues_fr ON eprint.eprintid =
   eprint__ordervalues_fr.eprintid ,
        -> eprint__rindex AS eprint__rindex WHERE eprint.eprintid =
   eprint__rindex.eprintid AND(
        ->     eprint.metadata_visibility = 'show' AND
   eprint.eprint_status = 'archive' AND(
        ->         eprint__rindex.field = 'title' AND
   eprint__rindex.word LIKE 'thermograph%' OR
        ->         eprint__rindex.field = 'titre_parallele_titre' AND
   eprint__rindex.word LIKE 'thermograph%' OR
        ->         eprint__rindex.field = 'autre_titre_titre' AND
   eprint__rindex.word LIKE 'thermograph%'
        ->     )
        -> ) GROUP BY eprint.eprintid ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.date ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.creators_name ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.title ORDER BY
   eprint__ordervalues_fr.date DESC ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.creators_name ASC ,
        -> eprint__ordervalues_fr.title ASC
        -> ;
   +----------+
   | eprintid |
   +----------+
   |   513588 |
   |   477759 |
   |   476746 |
   |   426892 |
   +----------+
   4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Just for testing, I have tried modifying EPrints/Database/mysql.pm (function sql_LIKE) : 

 * changing
     o return " COLLATE utf8_general_ci LIKE ";
 * to
     o return ' LIKE ';

Now, queries from advanced search run fast even with truncations.

However, I fear that this modification has side effects !
What do you think about it ?
Is it safe to go on without COLLATE utf8_general_ci ?
(Note: the eprint__rindex table is defined with this same collation)

Thanks for your advices,
Regards,
Gilles



Le 21/04/2015 11:41, John Salter a écrit :


Hi Giles,

One thing we did on our platform was the change described here:
https://github.com/eprints/eprints/issues/120 (see also: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/18677.html).
The description of this issue is around simple searches (when you’re not using Xapian), but I don’t know if it would have any effect on the advanced searches too.
In some circumstances, MySQL takes longer to work out the best way to run a query than it would take just running the query inefficiently. This change makes it try less iterations to find the ‘best’ way to run the query. 

Might be worth a try?

Cheers,

John
*From:*eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *martin.braendle@id.uzh.ch 
*Sent:* 21 April 2015 10:19
*To:* eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
*Subject:* [EP-tech] Antwort: Use of truncation in advanced searches

Hi Gilles,
our repo has about 80'000 records and 56% fulltext, so is comparable to yours. 

Advanced search of thermograph* in

title: immediate (1-2 seconds)
documents (full text): 20-30 seconds. The mysql daemon goes up to 70-100% CPU load. 

Quick search (Xapian):

title:thermograph*  : immediate
thermograph* : immediate
We recommend in our help page (http://www.zora.uzh.ch/help/) that Quick Search should be the tool of choice and only for very precise searches Advanced Search should be used.
From a recent debug session (on another issue) I know that EPrints translates behind the scenes an advanced search query into a series of dozens of complicated SQL statements. It might be that for certain cases these are not optimized. 

If it were that simple as
select distinct ei.eprintid from eprint__rindex ei, eprint e where ei.field='documents' and ei.word like 'thermograph%' and e.eprint_status='archive' and e.eprintid=ei.eprintid;
then that query would be answered in a fraction of a second. But it isn't, and can't be, and EPrints software engineers surely have put a lot of effort into the EPrints database engine part to cover all possible situations. 

Best regards,

Martin

--
Dr. Martin Brändle
Zentrale Informatik
Universität Zürich
Winterthurerstr. 190
CH-8057 Zürich
Inactive hide details for Gilles Fournié ---21/04/2015 10:22:27---Hi, I have a question about right-hand truncation in advancedGilles Fournié ---21/04/2015 10:22:27---Hi, I have a question about right-hand truncation in advanced searches.
Von: Gilles Fournié <gilles.fournie@cirad.fr <mailto:gilles.fournie@cirad.fr>> 
An: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Datum: 21/04/2015 10:22
Betreff: [EP-tech]  Use of truncation in advanced searches
Gesendet von: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk <mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------




Hi,

I have a question about right-hand truncation in advanced searches.

If we search for (in title for example) :

    thermography

the search runs for 1 to 3 seconds before returning results.

If we extend our search to :

    thermography thermographie

the search time is about the same.

But if we try to use a wildcard :

    thermograph*

the search takes a very long time (counts in minutes) !

Does somebody have experienced such delays ?
Any clues about what we can do to solve this problem ?

(our archive contains ~ 91000 eprints)

Best regards,
GF
*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/



*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
*** EPrints developers Forum: http://forum.eprints.org/