EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #02096
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Unreliable tweeting
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Unreliable tweeting
- From: "Cox, Alan G." <agc@nerc.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:32:07 +0100
If you’re using the recipe at
http://wiki.eprints.org/w/Twitter to tweet whenever a new item is deposited, do you find it reliable? I’m seeing a success rate of < 50% and don’t understand why. The failures are reported as failures in authentication – even though the OAuth credentials are the same as in the successful tweets. (See Wireshark captures below.) I’m intimate neither with OAuth nor the Twitter API so have just followed the recipe above (changing API version to 1.1). Is there anything else
I should know, or be looking at? I’m using LWP-Authen-OAuth-1.02. Thanks, Alan.
Alan Cox | Information, Systems & Technology
| Natural Environment Research Council
Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon, SN2 1EU, UK
+44 (0)1793 411963 |
agc@nerc.ac.uk A failing interaction: Request: POST /1.1/statuses/update.json HTTP/1.1 TE: deflate,gzip;q=0.3 Connection: TE, close Authorization: OAuth oauth_nonce="97985dac8caf0f62bef442099bc63476",oauth_timestamp="1373991134",oauth_version="1.0",oauth_consumer_key="HhWlbCIyWHggL9392ugnw",oauth_token="16218848-EoKnZSnlVJqw8TUbNsop2psmXdB4KXItPovG9lTqF",oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1",oauth_signature="S9jyoWZSLhEoc74j3taPjhYaKOs%3D" Host: api.twitter.com User-Agent: libwww-perl/6.03 Content-Length: 141 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded status=Among+population+differentiation+at+nuclear+genes+in+native+Scots+pine+(Pinus+sylvestris+L.)+in+Scotland+-+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FSPR2gl Response: HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized content-length: 63 content-type: application/json; charset=utf-8 date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:12:14 UTC server: tfe set-cookie: guest_id=v1%3A137399113479004887; Domain=.twitter.com; Path=/; Expires=Thu, 16-Jul-2015 16:12:14 UTC {"errors":[{"message":"Could not authenticate you","code":32}]} A successful interaction: Request: POST /1.1/statuses/update.json HTTP/1.1 TE: deflate,gzip;q=0.3 Connection: TE, close Authorization: OAuth oauth_nonce="a1646dd37fab3770fde2639dcca5a2c4",oauth_timestamp="1373991111",oauth_version="1.0",oauth_consumer_key="HhWlbCIyWHggL9392ugnw",oauth_token="16218848-EoKnZSnlVJqw8TUbNsop2psmXdB4KXItPovG9lTqF",oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1",oauth_signature="q03pqOdrEROd5ujXwYYhJ%2BQNkXE%3D" Host: api.twitter.com User-Agent: libwww-perl/6.03 Content-Length: 129 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded status=Declining+incidence+of+multi-trunking+over+time+in+a+Scottish+plantation+of+Picea+sitchensis+-+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FkKks8I Response: HTTP/1.1 200 OK cache-control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate, pre-check=0, post-check=0 content-length: 2088 content-type: application/json; charset=utf-8 date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:11:51 GMT etag: "9fd608a1954287eed92c00a020a5c0a1" expires: Tue, 31 Mar 1981 05:00:00 GMT last-modified: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:11:51 GMT pragma: no-cache server: tfe set-cookie: dnt=; domain=.twitter.com; path=/; expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:00 GMT set-cookie: lang=en; path=/ set-cookie: lang=en; path=/ set-cookie: lang=en; path=/ set-cookie: twid=******************; domain=.twitter.com; path=/; HttpOnly set-cookie: guest_id=***************; Domain=.twitter.com; Path=/; Expires=Thu, 16-Jul-2015 16:11:51 UTC status: 200 OK vary: Accept-Encoding x-access-level: read-write x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN x-mid: ********************* x-runtime: 0.60101 x-transaction: ******************* x-transaction-mask: *************************** <JSON body excised> This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system. |
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Memory usage in 3.2, Sword 1.3 and epdata packages
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] IRStats 2: Number of items and old access tables
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] eprints problem
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] IRStats 2: Number of items and old access tables
- Index(es):