EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #02012
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: How are the databases defined?
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: How are the databases defined?
- From: Sebastien Francois <sf2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:34:46 +0100
Hi Ian,They're defined by MetaField/Counter.pm - by default its ISA is MetaField/Int, perhaps change this to MetaField/BigInt
Otherwise look for get_sql_type() in MetaField/* Seb On 13/06/13 15:58, Ian Stuart wrote:
I have a need to slightly redefined the database fields in an future EPrint build.... I need to change the various counters & indexes to be "BIGINT"s rather than "INT"s (I need more than 2 million eprintids, for example) I can see a way to fudge setting the constant "INTEGER" to be a BigInt field... but I'm not sure I want to make *all* integer fields BigInts How/Where are they defined? (EP 3.2, if it makes a difference)
- References:
- [EP-tech] How are the databases defined?
- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] How are the databases defined?
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] How are the databases defined?
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Change in behaviour in Perl 5.16, and EPrints
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] How are the databases defined?
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] EPrints with new Twitter APIs v1.1
- Index(es):