EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #01633
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: workflow alterations....
- To: "'eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk'" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: workflow alterations....
- From: "Alan.Stiles" <Alan.Stiles@open.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:03:04 +0000
Hi Matt,
I'm just in the process of looking at something similar,
though I'm still at the early stages.
Thus far, using the Move_To_Dark_Archive example as a starting
point for defining a new review stage, I have also added redefinitions for
the following Screen functions to block and hide the various deposit stages
& buttons for my specific item type and then create a new stage view to
incorporate the Move_To_Dark_Archive Button instead of the standard
deposit
EPrint::render_blister()
EPrint::Edit::render_buttons()
EPrint::Deposit::can_be_viewed()
Note -
not actually creating a Dark Archive - just using that example from the wiki as
a starting point for my plugin.
Hope
that's of some help?
Alan
From: Matthew Brady [mailto:Matthew.Brady@usq.edu.au] Sent: 01 March 2013 07:08 To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk Subject: [EP-tech] workflow alterations.... Hi All, Currently an ePrint proceeds from inbox->buffer->live
archive What’s involved in implementing a review stage between inbox
and buffer… It is envisioned that the extra stage would allow faculty
admin staff to check/verify/signoff on certain details, before submitting for
editorial review. The faculty admin staff would be restricted to only relevant
faculty papers… and while the ePrint is in this stage, it wouldn’t be accessible
by the submitting user (unless returned) and wouldn’t be in the regular editor
workflow, until signed off… Thanks for any feedback/advice you can offer… Matt This email (including any attached files) is confidential and is for the intended recipient(s) only. If you received this email by mistake, please, as a courtesy, tell the sender, then delete this email. The views and opinions are the originator's and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Southern Queensland. Although all reasonable precautions were taken to ensure that this email contained no viruses at the time it was sent we accept no liability for any losses arising from its receipt. The University of Southern Queensland is a registered provider of education with the Australian Government. (CRICOS Institution Code QLD 00244B / NSW 02225M, TEQSA PRV12081 )
|
- References:
- [EP-tech] workflow alterations....
- From: Matthew Brady <Matthew.Brady@usq.edu.au>
- [EP-tech] workflow alterations....
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] {Disarmed} Open Repositories 2013 - Reminder: Deadline for proposals is Monday, March 4!
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Eprints REF2014 - 1.3
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] workflow alterations....
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: workflow alterations....
- Index(es):