EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #01582
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- To: <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Tim Brody <tdb2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:53:55 +0000
No, access consists of summary page and fulltext impressions. If that same robot requests full-texts and doesn't match on user-agent string then it will be counted. /Tim. On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:48:48 +0000, John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > Do OAI-PMH harvests appear in the access table? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk > [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Alan.Stiles > Sent: 15 February 2013 10:30 > To: 'eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk' > Subject: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table > > Hi Tim, > > Having a quick look through the access table, it might also be nice if > there was the option to include / exclude a list of known robots and > spiders from the csv dumps, and possibly just to strip them from the > access table outside of the dumps, keeping it to a more manageable size > without losing 'relevant' information - Bing and Yandex appear to be among > our worst offenders. > > Alan. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Brody [mailto:tdb2@ecs.soton.ac.uk] > Sent: 15 February 2013 09:32 > To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk > Subject: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table > > Hi, > > Yes, there is nothing in the core that relies on data in access*. The > IRStats 1 & 2 use access to create their summary data. > > It looks like the best solution is to provide a tool to periodically dump > historic access data to files, but that it is still useful to keep > "current" (defined by config) data in the database. > > All the best, > Tim. > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:13:52 +0100, Yuri <yurj@alfa.it> wrote: >> We've a test server which is a clone of the production server. Can I >> empty those access tables safely to save space? :) can I do an "delete * >> from access" without any issue? The same for access__ordervalues_en and >> all the languages? >> >> Il 15/02/2013 03:13, Mark Gregson ha scritto: >>> Hi Tim >>> >>> Because of the DB backup issues we invested some time a while ago in > some >>> scripts for archiving the access data off to monthly dumps and for >>> restoring it (if required, say be the need to have IRStats reprocess all >>> data). These scripts are not actually in production use because I > haven't >>> had time to test it to my satisfaction (sorry Nick!). >>> >>> CSV is a more accessible format than a MySQL dump, which may be a >>> benefit. >>> >>> We are using IRStats for statistics which uses the access table but I >>> guess this will be easily updated with a new parser. We also do some >>> custom logging to the access table for reporting on outbound link clicks >>> via IRStats. This logging is handled via EPrints::Apache::LogHandler. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>> [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tim Brody >>> Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2013 8:01 PM >>> To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>> Subject: [EP-tech] RFC access log table >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm thinking about the access log table and how it can be made >>> sustainable. >>> >>> What I'm suggesting is to write accesses to CSV-formatted log files, one >>> file per month. What I don't know is whether anyone is relying on the >>> database table for generating statistics? >>> >>> The problem the access log table creates is in backing-up the EPrints >>> database. >>> >>> I'd appreciate any thoughts/comments. >>> >>> -- >>> All the best, >>> Tim >>> >>> *** Options: > http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech >>> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ >>> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ >> >> *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech >> *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ >> *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ > > -- > All the best, > Tim. > *** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech > *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ > *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/ -- All the best, Tim.
- References:
- [EP-tech] RFC access log table
- From: Tim Brody <tdb2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Mark Gregson <mark.gregson@qut.edu.au>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Yuri <yurj@alfa.it>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Tim Brody <tdb2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: "Alan.Stiles" <Alan.Stiles@open.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] RFC access log table
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] {Disarmed} summary page with link
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- Index(es):