EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #01576
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Yuri <yurj@alfa.it>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:59:15 +0100
Great! 5,9 GB freed :-) IRStats use them once or they need them always? Il 15/02/2013 10:32, Tim Brody ha scritto:
Hi, Yes, there is nothing in the core that relies on data in access*. The IRStats 1& 2 use access to create their summary data. It looks like the best solution is to provide a tool to periodically dump historic access data to files, but that it is still useful to keep "current" (defined by config) data in the database. All the best, Tim. On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:13:52 +0100, Yuri<yurj@alfa.it> wrote:We've a test server which is a clone of the production server. Can I empty those access tables safely to save space? :) can I do an "delete * from access" without any issue? The same for access__ordervalues_en and all the languages? Il 15/02/2013 03:13, Mark Gregson ha scritto:Hi Tim Because of the DB backup issues we invested some time a while ago insomescripts for archiving the access data off to monthly dumps and for restoring it (if required, say be the need to have IRStats reprocess all data). These scripts are not actually in production use because Ihaven'thad time to test it to my satisfaction (sorry Nick!). CSV is a more accessible format than a MySQL dump, which may be a benefit. We are using IRStats for statistics which uses the access table but I guess this will be easily updated with a new parser. We also do some custom logging to the access table for reporting on outbound link clicks via IRStats. This logging is handled via EPrints::Apache::LogHandler. Cheers Mark -----Original Message----- From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tim Brody Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2013 8:01 PM To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk Subject: [EP-tech] RFC access log table Hi All, I'm thinking about the access log table and how it can be made sustainable. What I'm suggesting is to write accesses to CSV-formatted log files, one file per month. What I don't know is whether anyone is relying on the database table for generating statistics? The problem the access log table creates is in backing-up the EPrints database. I'd appreciate any thoughts/comments. -- All the best, Tim *** Options:http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech *** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/ *** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/
- Follow-Ups:
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Tim Brody <tdb2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- References:
- [EP-tech] RFC access log table
- From: Tim Brody <tdb2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Mark Gregson <mark.gregson@qut.edu.au>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Yuri <yurj@alfa.it>
- [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- From: Tim Brody <tdb2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] RFC access log table
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: RFC access log table
- Index(es):