EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive

Message: #01293


< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First

[EP-tech] Re: Bug in ePrints 3.3.10?


James,

 

Try to downgrade libxml2 to the earlier version.  Maybe it will solve the problem. 

 

Command: yum downgrade libxml2 libxml2-python

 

Regards,

Salleh

 

From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Caldow, James
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 5:21 PM
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Bug in ePrints 3.3.10?

 

Ah, many thanks for that, John.

 

I couldn't find anything relating to it and was worried it was either something I'd done or something that had been missed in the latest update. I'm glad it's a known issue and, hopefully, it will be resolved soon.

 

At least it can be worked around.

 

Regards,

 

James


John Salter <J.Salter@leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
James,
This is due to an update to LibXML - which now doesn't seem to pull in the system entities properly.
I ran into the same issue recently when someone applied some security patches to my RHEL6 server without telling me - and everything went very awry.

This call has been raised: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863166

This thread: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/17090.html also describes this issue.

Cheers,
John


-----Original Message-----
From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Caldow, James
Sent: 06 November 2012 14:01
To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: [EP-tech] Re: Bug in ePrints 3.3.10?

Sorry, the email formatting has stripped the solution entity. For the space character the change made was entity &#160 in place of &nbsp.

Apologies for any confusion caused!


James Caldow



-----Original Message-----
From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk on behalf of Caldow, James
Sent: Tue 11/6/2012 13:41
To: EPrints.org Technical List
Subject: [EP-tech]  Bug in ePrints 3.3.10?

Hi,

After a number of unsuccessful attempts to install 3.3.10, I wanted to ask if the following was a known bug:

The file lib/lang/en/phrases/system.xml contains three occurrences of "&nbsp;", (two on line 396 and one on line 3006).

On a clean installation of CentOS 6.3 and 3.3.10, attempting to run bin/epadmin create resulted in multiple errors regarding parsing of the above file and created an archive with multiple broken links and "phrase not defined" errors.

Changing the three occurrences of "&nbsp;" to " " resulted in a clean build and no errors.

I don't currently have another test environment on which to confirm these errors, so would appreciate any input on whether this bug only exists as a result of the OS environment, or if it is a genuine bug in the 3.3.10 release. I do know that XML doesn't support "&nbsp;", so would assume this will be a problem for all.


Regards,


James Caldow

_______________________________

James Caldow

Educational Resource Centre
Queen Margaret University
Queen Margaret University Drive
Musselburgh
EH21 6UU

Tel: 0131 474 0000
Fax: 0131 474 0001
E-Mail: jcaldow@qmu.ac.uk



*** Options: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/eprints-tech
*** Archive: http://www.eprints.org/tech.php/
*** EPrints community wiki: http://wiki.eprints.org/



Disclaimer:
This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, distribution, printing, copying or use of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender or Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) immediately and delete the original message. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail that do not relate to the official business of UUM and/or its group of companies shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by UUM and UUM accepts no responsibility for the same. All liability arising from or in connection with computer viruses and/or corrupted e-mails is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by law.