EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
Message: #00477
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] Re: EPrints COUNTER Compliance
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] Re: EPrints COUNTER Compliance
- From: Mark Gregson <mark.gregson@qut.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 09:35:29 +1000
Thanks Tim that's great. Cheers Mark -----Original Message----- From: eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk [mailto:eprints-tech-bounces@ecs.soton.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tim Brody Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2012 2:09 AM To: eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk Subject: [EP-tech] Re: EPrints COUNTER Compliance On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 10:19 +1000, Mark Gregson wrote: > The reference to the PIRUS PUSH code made me think of EPrints’ and > COUNTER. I was under the impression that EPrints didn't log accesses > in a COUNTER compliant way. > > > > Looking at our 3.2.7 install, the problems appear to be that it > doesn't log 304 requests as COUNTER requires and the robots list is > incomplete (assuming EPrints::Apache::LogHandler is the correct place > to look). Count 304: http://trac.eprints.org/eprints/changeset/7673 Updated robots list: http://trac.eprints.org/eprints/changeset/7672 > Also, is the double-click filtering implemented? No, this would need to be a part of whatever report generating you are doing. -- All the best, Tim
- References:
- [EP-tech] EPrints COUNTER Compliance
- From: Mark Gregson <mark.gregson@qut.edu.au>
- [EP-tech] Re: EPrints COUNTER Compliance
- From: Tim Brody <tdb2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- [EP-tech] EPrints COUNTER Compliance
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Request 3.3.9 Debian
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: Garbage indexing some pdf
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] Re: EPrints COUNTER Compliance
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Simple Search Parameters
- Index(es):