EPrints Technical Mailing List Archive
See the EPrints wiki for instructions on how to join this mailing list and related information.
Message: #00042
< Previous (by date) | Next (by date) > | < Previous (in thread) | Next (in thread) > | Messages - Most Recent First | Threads - Most Recent First
[EP-tech] FW: REF2014 Plug-in installation failed because of duplicate fields
- To: "eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <eprints-tech@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: [EP-tech] FW: REF2014 Plug-in installation failed because of duplicate fields
- From: "Tian, Jia" <J.Tian@kingston.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:06:31 +0000
Dear All, Sorry to bother again. I was
trying to install REF2014 plug-in on our demo server which runs 3.3.8. However,
when I tried to upgrade the database schema. I got a system error complaining
about a duplicate field “user.dob” as followed: ------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------- EPrints
System Error ---------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Duplicate field name
encountered: user.dob ------------------------------------------------------------------ EPrints System Error inducing
stack dump at
/opt/eprints3/bin/../perl_lib/EPrints.pm line 143
EPrints::abort('EPrints') called at
/opt/eprints3/bin/../perl_lib/EPrints/DataSet.pm line 615
EPrints::DataSet::register_field('EPrints::DataSet=HASH(0x9f2a208)',
'EPrints::MetaField::Date=HASH(0x9f2a978)', 0) called at
/opt/eprints3/bin/../perl_lib/EPrints/DataSet.pm line 584
EPrints::DataSet::process_field('EPrints::DataSet=HASH(0x9f2a208)',
'HASH(0x9da8c38)', 0) called at
/opt/eprints3/bin/../perl_lib/EPrints/DataSet.pm line 507
EPrints::DataSet::new('EPrints::DataSet', 'repository',
'EPrints::Repository=HASH(0x99d1ba4)', 'name', 'user', 'search',
'HASH(0x9da8920)', 'triggers', 'HASH(0x9da895c)', ...) called at
/opt/eprints3/bin/../perl_lib/EPrints/Repository.pm line 1328
EPrints::Repository::_load_datasets('EPrints::Repository=HASH(0x99d1ba4)')
called at /opt/eprints3/bin/../perl_lib/EPrints/Repository.pm line 475
EPrints::Repository::load_config('EPrints::Repository=HASH(0x99d1ba4)') called
at /opt/eprints3/bin/../perl_lib/EPrints/Repository.pm line 153
EPrints::Repository::new('EPrints::Repository', 'kuirdemo', 'noise', 1) called
at /opt/eprints3/bin/../perl_lib/EPrints.pm line 491
EPrints::repository('EPrints=HASH(0x99d1b80)', 'kuirdemo', 'noise', 1) called
at ./epadmin line 367
main::repository('kuirdemo') called at ./epadmin line 1792
main::update_database_structure('kuirdemo') called at ./epadmin line 312 I have checked my database
and indeed there exists a field “dob” in the “user” table already because of
R4R plug-in. After I compared the
“zz_r4r.pl” file (R4R plug-in) and “zz_ref.pl” (REF2014 plug-in), I can see
several duplicate fields defined (not only the “dob” field): I wonder how I can resolve this
issue while keeping the R4R plug-in which I found is useful. Shall I simply
comment out the duplicate field definitions in the “zz_ref.pl” file and
continue? If so, would it influence the using of REF2014 plug-in? Thank you so
much for the kind help in advance! Best Wishes, Jia Jia Tian Systems Analyst,
Infrastructure, Information Services T Internal:
62079 T 020
8417 2079 Kingston University London Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon
Thames KT1 2EE Information in this email and
any attachments are confi dential, and may not be copied or used by anyone
other than the addressee, nor disclosed to any third party without our
permission. There is no intention to create any legally binding contract or
other commitment through the use of this email. Please consider the environment
before printing this email. This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. |
- Prev by Date: [EP-tech] How to make the Abstract field mandatory?
- Next by Date: [EP-tech] Re: How to make the Abstract field mandatory?
- Previous by thread: [EP-tech] How to make the Abstract field mandatory?
- Next by thread: [EP-tech] Re: REF2014 Plug-in installation failed because of duplicate fields
- Index(es):